w USA to chyba jakiś krach co Ken ?

Adidas, po wynikach, skończył sesję na -4,1%, rynek zaniepokoiły prognozy, jakoś nie widać tego ożywienia...

Cholewa, znowu dystrybucja w Stanach. Jest już zielono więc źle.
Tak Ken?

Skończona dystrybucja w Stanach.

Teraz będzie dobrze.

Znasz słowo "dobrze" Ken? Co ono znaczy dla Ciebie?

U nas też już zaczyna brakować na emerytury, więc szykują wydłużenie wieku emerytalnego, bo nieważne że pracy będzie coraz mniej, chodzi o to, żeby jak najmniej płacić, bo przy takim modelu gospodarowania. gdzie nie gospodarka jest dla człowieka, tylko człowiek dla gospodarki, nie będzie z czego...
W Stanach problem ten rozwiązuje się sam, starsi ludzie nie chcą przechodzić na emeryturę, bo nie będą mieli na przeżycie. A szykuje się ogromna fala związana z boom'em powojennym..
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
70% Of The Elderly Aren't Retiring Because They Can't Afford To Anymore
A new survey from Career Builder exposes what will be an increasingly common trend as America ages demographically -- older workers are being forced to keep working and postpone retirement for financial reasons.
CareerBuilder:

More than seven-in-ten (72 percent) workers over the age of 60 who said they are putting off their retirement are doing so because they can't afford to retire financially.

A mnie to szczególnie szlag trafia, że atakuje się tu człowieka trzeźwo patrzącego na świat, realnie oceniającego przyszłą (jak i teraźniejszą) sytuację światowych potęg i tych mniej światowych też, który - nie wącha butaprenów, nie pali ziół i nie zakłada różowych okularów w odróżnieniu od większości atakujących, którym strasznie niewygodne są prawdziwe dane o wszelkich tarapatach mogących negatywnie rzutować na fluktuacje cenowe papierów na których właśnie siedzą szydercy Obi-Vana Kenobiego. Najbardziej wnerwiające jest to, że jednĄ z tych szyderców jest dziewiętnastoletnia Wioletta S. zamieszkała w filmowych Wilkowyjach, która ledwie co zdała maturę (albo i nie..), mało tego - prawie pewne jest, że z prawdziwymi inwestycjami nigdy nie miała styczności, nie posiada rachunku maklerskiego, ale panoszy się tutaj, bo jest chorobliwą mitomanką ze skłonnością do agresji i być może też wydaje jej się, że Kenobi i Niedźwiedzica to jedno i to samo, ale tak panno Sulik nie jest!

Even as many Americans still struggle to recover from the country's worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, another crisis – one that will be even worse than the current one – is looming, according to a new report from a group of leading economists, financiers, and former federal regulators.

In the report, the panel, that includes Rob Johnson of the United Nations Commission of Experts on Finance and bailout watchdog Elizabeth Warren, warns that financial regulatory reform measures proposed by the Obama administration and Congress must be beefed up to prevent banks from continuing to engage in high risk investing that precipitated the near collapse of the U.S. economy in 2008.

The report warns that the country is now immersed in a "doomsday cycle" wherein banks use borrowed money to take massive risks in an attempt to pay big dividends to shareholders and big bonuses to management – and when the risks go wrong, the banks receive taxpayer bailouts from the government.

Murray Rothbard never tired of pointing out that in a free society plain citizens could bring inflationary fractional reserve banks to heel through a deliberate and concerted campaign to get people to withdraw their deposits in cash. “Antibank Leagues,” as he called them, would be formed by those “who know the truth about the real insolvency of the banking system” to “urge bank runs.” The bank runs or their very threat would “be able to stop and reverse monetary expansion.”

Now we have the first stirrings of the formation of such a league in the Move Your Money campaign. This modest but growing movement is urging people to move their money from big banks to small community banks and credit unions. Establishment media such as Time, Newsweek, The Nation, Salon and CBS News have already taken note of the campaign. The organizers are urging people to lobby their friends, organizations, and municipal governments to move their money and to use online social networks to propagate the idea.

The organizers of the Move Your Money campaign of course are superficially focused on the fact that big banks and financial institutions were at the eye of the recent financial storm. They do not understand that it is the entire system of fractional reserve banking, which has been cartelized, regulated and bailed out by the Federal Reserve System for nearly a century, that is mainly at fault for the financial meltdown. Still, the idea underlying Move Your Money is a sound one that needs to be expanded to include mass deposit withdrawal from all banks.

Depositors have more power over banks than customers have over normal businesses in a market economy. The reason is that banks are permitted by law today to hold only about ten percent of demand deposits and zero percent of so-called “saving” deposits in ready cash reserve, even though they are contractually obligated to redeem these deposits in cash whenever the depositor requests. Thus the banking system would not be able to withstand a concerted campaign to withdraw cash and the Fed would have to shut down the banking system (including ATMs) to sort things out. It would take months, if not a year, before the Fed could print up and deliver sufficient quantities of cash to the banks to meet all of their depositors’ demands in full. In the meantime cash withdrawals might be limited to small quantities biweekly or monthly as occurred in Argentina during the last meltdown of the peso in 2000–2001.